Copyright © 1999 Roy C. Flannagan and the Johns Hopkins University Press. All rights reserved. This work may be used, with this header included, for noncommercial purposes within a subscribed institution. No copies of this work may be distributed electronically outside of the subscribed institution, in whole or in part, without express written permission from the JHU Press.
Milton Quarterly 33.1 (1999) 1-21

A Bibliographical Guide to the Study of Milton's Prose


Abbreviations

The following abbreviations have been adopted from the Index to The Works of John Milton, edited by Frank Allen Patterson et al., (New York: Columbia UP, 1931-38), I: xiii-xvi.

A Animadversions upon the Remonstrants Defence
AP An Apology against a Pamphlet
AR Areopagitica
B History of Britain
Bd Digression in the History of Britain
BN Brief Notes upon a Late Sermon
C Colasterion
CD Christian Doctrine
CG Reason of Church-Government Urg'd against Prelaty
CP A Treatise of Civil Power
D The Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce
1D First Defence
2D Second Defence
E Of Education
H Considerations Touching the Likeliest Means to Remove Hirelings out of the Church
HM History of Muscovia
K Eikonoklastes
M The Judgement of Martin Bucer
O Observations on the Articles of Peace
P Of Prelatical Episcopacy
R Of Reformation
SD Pro se Defensio
T Tetrachordon
TE The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates
TR Of True Religion, Heresy, Schism, Toleration
W The Ready and Easy Way to Establish a Free Commonwealth

Rationale

No place affords a more striking conviction of the vanity of human hopes, than a publick library; for who can see the wall crouded on every side by mighty volumes, the works of laborious meditation, and accurate enquiry, now scarcely known but by the catalogue, and preserved only to encrease the pomp of learning, without considering how many hours have been wasted in vain endeavours, how often imagination has anticipated the praises of futurity, now many statues have risen to the eye of vanity, how many ideal converts have elevated zeal, how often wit has exulted in the eternal infamy of his antagonists, and dogmatism has delighted in the gradual advances of his authority, the immutability of his decrees, and the perpetuity of his power?

(Samuel Johnson, The Rambler, number 106, 1751)

Over three centuries of Milton scholarship crowd the catalogues and line the remoter stacks of our public and academic libraries. Though we share some of Johnson's impatience with the pomp of scholarship, with the spurious immortality conferred by a redundant footnote or an exhaustive bibliography, we feel the transience of scholarly pertinence (let alone fame) should be regarded rather differently. Critical methodology and theory and, with them, the focus of critical endeavor mutate in step with the mutations of those larger aspects of cultural ideology to which they relate in complex ways. Much of what scholars and critics do is provisional or transitional, and late twentieth-century Milton criticism, so often suffused with the nurtured skepticisms and uncertainties of our age, perhaps may have much less to say to our successors than the Tory gloom of Johnson's own critical observations has to say to ours.

This bibliographical guide is both personal and purposeful. We offer our own views of those avenues by which our contemporaries may access and advance the study of Milton's prose. We have not aimed at exhaustivity--in part, because Milton is already particularly well served in that respect by other bibliographies (see items 6, 17-24), in part because we see that to run counter to our purpose. Wherever a study, no matter what its obvious importance to the period in which it was published, appears obsolete, we have either said so or tacitly omitted it.

Learning, it is often remarked, progresses through remembering. But it progresses, too, by forgetting. The technology already exists and may well soon be applied to surround each area of humanistic enquiry with electronic databases holding the product of all earlier enquiry within the field. Such richness, unless appropriately filtered and controlled, gluts and [End Page 1] sickens; to change the metaphor to one Milton might have used, so heavy a baggage train would retard any advance.

Our method, then, is to select, to order and to recommend; we neither disguise nor apologize for its subjectivity and its underlying tendency, for it is a reading list for our kinds of reading of Milton, a Milton who is ideologically fractured and flawed, who negotiates uncomfortably and in contradictory fashion his own relationship with a rapidly transshifting cultural and political ascendancy, a Milton whose prose so minutely engages the exigencies of contemporary polemic that its larger theses appear only fragmentarily, a Milton who invokes astonishing stylistic control and controversial skill in morally dubious battle to crush the gilded bug of Joseph Hall, to thrash the impertinence of the refuter of his first divorce tract, and to wield the iconoclast's maul against the pious Eikon of his dead king.

I. Editions

Currently, only two scholarly editions of Milton's complete prose works merit consideration:

Most significantly, 2 prints only translations of Milton's Latin prose, so recourse to the parallel Latin-English text of 1 may be necessary for many purposes. 1 has a superb, two-volume index.

A number of editions designed primarily for pedagogic purposes contain at least samples of much of the prose. Among the more recently current are

Most offer no more than a handful of tracts printed in their totality, and selection inevitably mirrors the tastes and priorities of the editors.

AR and E recur, sensibly annotated, in

AR, D, E, TE and W, as well as selections from CD, CG, and 2D are included in

A fairly large selection of the prose is also to be found in

Generally, selections produce a rather misleading image of Milton as prose controversialist, foregrounding the more philosophical works and those most attractive to the liberal sensibility (E, AR, TE), at the expense of the more pugnacious tracts, such as C or K: Milton the thinker is more copiously represented than Milton the streetfighter.

Some scholarly investigation is best served by [End Page 2] consideration of the early editions (it is difficult, for example, to construct a sense of the distinctions between the first and second editions of D from 2), and at least a cursory glance at them, stripped of the recontextualizing apparatus of a modern edition, yields a rather different sense of their role and nature. One or two are very rare, though major research libaries usually hold a good range. Fortunately, scholars without easy access to such collections may read most of them on microfilm. George Thomason collected a considerable proportion of the press output of the 1640s and 1650s, among them nearly all of Milton's works, some of which are endorsed by Thomason as gifts from the author. The collection has been made available on microfilm. The following list includes both the shelf marks of the Thomason Collection, now housed in the British Library (though, for reasons of conservation, available to readers only by special request), together with reel numbers of the microfilm edition:

Consideration of the tracts which Milton engaged or which, in turn, were directed at his writing may prove rewarding, and most of the more important are included in the Thomason Collection.

As a context for Milton's antiprelatical pamphlets, see

On the divorce tracts, see

For the vernacular republican tracts of 1649 and the Latin defences, see:

On the pamphlets of 1660, see

Thomason collected numerous other items which either refer to Milton or which engage the issues with which he involved himself. Moreover, as titles came into his possession, he habitually endorsed them with a date of receipt, so one can search out material that came into currency in close contemporaneity with Milton's tracts. The catalogue of the collection is organized, primarily, on chronological principles based on Thomason's datings, though it also has a sound index and a considerable amount of cross-referencing between tracts which are elements within the same controversies:

The lengthy (and, indeed, verbose) 11.35 has also been issued in a facsimile edition:

Curiously, though it was published in a myriad of editions, Thomason did not collect a copy of the most famous book Milton engaged in his prose, namely the Eikon Basilike, which was published as Charles I's apologia for his own conduct in the 1640s. Original copies are to be found in many libraries. It is available, also, in a modern edition:

Its complex bibliography has been untangled in

See also John T. Shawcross's copious and richly detailed "A Survey of Milton's Prose Works" (92.11), which brings together a wealth of information about early publishing history and contemporary response and reaction.

II. Bibliographies

Milton has been well served with bibliographies, especially of secondary material. 6 contains 30 pages of bibliography, in a well structured form. Fuller Milton bibliographies are

For guides to earlier material relating to Milton's writing, see [End Page 4]

For material relating to Milton from 1800 to 1928, see

III. Reference Works

A very valuable concordance to Milton's vernacular prose has been based on the text of 2:

Some of the political activists whom Milton mentions or engages or who wrote analogues or responses to his writing are the subject of biographical notes in

Fuller and sometimes more reliable information is available on most of them in 27, which contains entries on contemporaries from throughout the political spectrum.

Topics related to Milton's prose figure also in

For a chronology of Milton's life and work, see

IV. Life-Records, Biographies, and the Immediate Historical Context

Milton has probably attracted more biographical attention than any other canonical English writer, in part because the considerable quantity of material available, in part because of his high political profile, and in part because of the controversial nature of so many aspects of his oeuvre. Perhaps the most abidingly useful biographical exercise is

French locates a myriad of references to Milton in both published works and archival material. the Life Records is invaluable in attempting to assess the contemporary impact of Milton's writings.

A number of younger contemporaries and others in the generations which followed closely after his death published biographical memoirs, among them two nephews and others who either knew him themselves or else had access to some of his familiars. The early lives by John and Edward Phillips, John Aubrey, Anthony Wood, John Toland, and Jonathan Richardson, well edited and with excellent notes and introduction, appear in

Numerous biographies of Milton were written in the eighteenth century, often in association with editions of his poetry. Among them, Dr. Johnson's is perhaps the only one which may still stimulate some thought about his prose. Frequently reprinted, the earliest edition is in

On early responses to Milton, see also 92.11.

The fullest biography of Milton and the one which most consistently contextualizes his prose writing is

Inevitably, Masson views the political crises from the perspective of mid-nineteenth-century historiography, and considerable new evidence relating to Milton's life and the publishing history of his pamphlets has emerged in the intervening years. Nevertheless, Masson, probably more than any subsequent biographer, recognizes the importance of setting Milton's prose against the week-by-week developments in English political history. Some of the connections he makes between Milton and his contemporaries show an imaginative acuteness. In many approaches to Milton's prose Masson repays attention.

Among more recent biographies, the most important is

Interpretatively, Parker rather devalues the prose, viewing the 1640s and 1650s not as decades of achievement but as an unfortunate diversion from Milton's creative destiny. The strength of Parker's biography rests on the wealth and detail of its documentation, which comprises, with the quite usable index, nearly all of the second volume.

A slighter and much less scholarly (but highly readable account) account may be found in

All these biographies to a greater or less degree work to contextualise Milton politically. Perhaps the most important book of the relatively recent past to tackle this is

Hill's thesis about Milton's politics is that his radical and heterodox notions relate more closely than had been appreciated to what he terms the "third-culture" radicalism of some of the extremer sectaries. It is interestingly engaged in

Milner locates Milton's political thought within Revolutionary Independency and works to differentiate that from the ideology of other, more radical groups such as the Levellers. For a qualifying note on the argument of 36, see also

Corns argues that Milton's publications of the early 1640s attempt to differentiate him from the stereotypical image of the extremer sectary. Hill has also contextualized some aspects of Milton's writing in

Two earlier studies which broadly share the same area of investigation as 36-37 are

Both are characterized by a humane commitment, though in some ways they have been superseded by [End Page 6] later, somewhat broader, views of Milton's place in the political history of the period; Wolfe remains particularly interesting on Milton's relationship to the Levellers, to Winstanley, and to other figures more radical than himself.

See also

In a wide-ranging review of the ways in which Milton has been situated politically Corns argues that an element of ideological indeterminacy obtains, in that the implications of Milton's texts are shaped not only be his beliefs but by the polemical context and by the implications of the genres in which they are inscribed.

For a discussion of Milton's association with the Hartlib circle, see

V. The Larger Historical Context

Most of Milton's prose engages deeply the developing crises of the central decades of the century. While 2 offers introductory material to contextualize the pamphlets, usually in some detail and sometimes, as in the case of Austin Woolrych's account in volume 7 of the events leading up to the Restoration, with authority and precision, nevertheless serious students of the prose will find it necessary to launch out into the troubled waters of Civil War historiography. On aspects of intellectual, religious, and cultural history, see especially

On political, social and economic history, see

On publishing history, press control and the history of propaganda, see

VI. General Accounts of Milton's Prose

There is only one single-author book-length study giving a general account of Milton's prose:

In addition, two recent books devote several chapters to the prose:

Achinstein cogently contextualizes Milton's prose, as well as Paradise Lost, within the pamphlet debates of his time. Cable focuses on the language of Milton's iconoclasm in the antiprelatical tracts, AR, D, and K, while devoting a chapter to Samson Agonistes.

In addition, four very important collections of original essays by several hands have been published:

Contents:

The second important collection is

Contents:

A recent collection focuses on Milton's politics

Contents:

For a collection of essays that examine Milton's religious beliefs, see

Contents:

For an accessible pedagogic introduction, see

VII. Style, Rhetoric, Imagery, Punctuation

Milton's prose style received a flawed but still partially useful linguistic and quantitative analysis in

Emma's account, which also considers the poetry, uses a small and poorly constructed control, selecting texts for comparison with Milton which are neither contemporary nor situationally analogous; often we have no sense of whether the traits which he identifies as characteristic differentiate Milton or merely differentiate seventeenth-century discursive prose from other kinds of writing at other periods, though some of his observations on small-scale linguistic features, such as aspects of accidence, do still carry some conviction.

Many of the questions which Emma addressed are reconsidered in

This study, which closely compares Milton's practice with that of contemporary pamphleteers, also considers the structure and incidence of imagery in Milton's prose.

Challenging questions about the relationship between the expository techniques of Milton and more radical writers receive attention in

For an account of larger rhetorical structures, see also

Several aspects of Milton's stylistic and linguistic predilections have received attention. On aspects of sentence structure, see

On aspects of lexis, including the use of loanwords, genre distinction and the incidence of registral abnormality, see

For an assessment of the polemical implications of iterative imagery in the controversial prose of Milton and his contemporaries, see

The best account of Milton's punctuation practice in the context of changing contemporary norms is

But Treip's account, though a valuable introduction to contemporary punctuation conventions, does not directly treat his prose, for which see

VIII. The Antiprelatical Pamphlets

The antiprelatical pamphlets (R, P, CG, C, AP) were the subject of some singularly acute studies in the 1960s and 1970s

and in important sections of:

There has latterly been a strong critical response to these tracts. See especially 92.2, 92.3, 93.2, 93.3, 95.3 and

On the millenarian aspect of Milton's early prose, see 155 and

On Milton's place in the tradition of aggressive wit in polemical prose, see [End Page 12]

Other studies, less frequently cited in recent discussion, include

IX. The Divorce Tracts, Areopagitica, and Of Education

Milton's gender politics have move to the center of many critical discussions in recent times, and his divorce tracts, and the attitudes and values inscribed within them, have assumed a reinvigorated significance. See especially 80, 93.4, 93.5, and

For other accounts see

AR remains the most popular of Milton's tracts both in terms of undergraduate study and research interest; it is also his most frequently translated. Much of its popularity is no doubt explicable in terms both of the elevation of its expression and the apparent liberalism of the sentiment thus expressed. Sententiae from it adorn the walls of public libraries and the endpapers of popular editions of literary classics; the whole text is inscribed as a frieze around Hart House Great Hall of the University of Toronto. Yet the question of how Milton defines and restricts freedom of expression--and the related questions of just how radical a pamphlet AR really is and of its place in the larger radical tradition-- have prompted some of the best critical responses. AR figures largely [End Page 13] in many of the general accounts listed in section IV. Important discussions include 92.4, 93.6, and

For interesting responses to the imagery, see

E continues to interest editors rather more than it stimulates a scholarly response. Neither 92 nor 93 contains a consideration of it, though several essays consider it in passing. On the context of Renaissance educational practice, see

X. The Tracts of 1649

Although TE, O and K have stimulated fewer critical responses than they merit and many aspects remain unexplored, some readings have been particularly acute. Latterly, the concept of iconoclasm has proved a useful fulcrum on which to turn accounts of K. On the background to the notion, see

For iconoclasm as a pervasive Miltonic motif and its place in this tradition see the astute

For discussions of K from this perspective, see 90, 91, 92.6, 93.8, and fine account in

For a well-illustrated and intelligent discussion of the imaging of King Charles the Martyr, see

A collection of essays on representations of King Charles is forthcoming,

The topic is also considered in 85. The most stimulating account of Milton's relationship with Eikon Basilike is:

See, also

The relationship between the image of kingship produced in Eikonoklastes and in the poetry is con sidered in

Many aspects of Tenure of Kings and Magistrates invite fresh enquiry, particularly concerning its place in the contemporaneously burgeoning domain of political science, though 2 is useful. 92.5 is disappointingly ahistorical. 155 has some shrewd comments.

Hardly anyone has looked critically at O, in part no doubt because of the style--much of it is the reproduction, as a prelude to refutation or comment, of dry and drossy stuff by Milton's enemies, and Milton's own parts are among the least flamboyant of his prose; perhaps, too, Miltonists have been a little embarrassed by this tract, in a sense written for hire and in justification of an aggressive Irish policy that lead to the massacres of Wexford and Drogheda and the seizure of land and displacement of indigenous population. 2 has some astute historical observations. [End Page 15] The only two article-length engagements are 93.7, and,

Two articles which deal with Milton's relationship to Spenser's Irish writings are

On the larger Irish historical context, see

XI. The Tracts of 1659-1660 and Of True Religion

A number of strong accounts cover well Milton's publications and the manuscript prose dating from the period just before the Restoration. 2's account, especially Woolrych's historical introduction, is masterful. For a purposeful and convincing overview still well worth consideration see:

See also

On CP see 92.8; on H, see

On CP and H, see 93.11.

W and the relationships between its two editions have stimulated some good work. On Milton in the crisis of the Republic, see 92.7 and

Two recent accounts view W, cogently, as lamen tation and excoriation, as a jeremiad for the lost republic: 93.12 and 63.

On the little regarded TR, see

XII. The Histories

On the B see 155, 93.14, and

For a book length study of B, see

On the Bd, see

On HM, see

On larger aspects of Milton's work as historian and of his place in the broad tradition of western and British historiography, see

XIII. State Papers and the Latin Defences

The best accounts of Milton's work as a public servant of the English Republic are

This discloses from archival material that had not been available previously the view of Milton developed by a German diplomat who worked with him in the preparation of a "safeguard" or treaty between Oldenburg and the English Republic; incidentally, it richly contextualizes Milton's work as civil servant and illuminates some aspects of his Latinity and its relationship to the norms of seventeenth-century civil-service practice. It is a much more useful book than its eccentric title suggests.

See also

On the Latin Defences see 93.10, 155, and

Lieb devotes the final section of his book to the pamphlet war, the international "theatre of assault," that Milton entered into by writing the Latin Defences.

There are some astute comments in

XIV. De Doctrina Christiana

For an invaluable guide to Milton's references to scripture, see

Most other studies of the text are deeply controversial, and relate both to discussion of the state of completion in which we find the manuscript and a larger and sometimes quite acrimonious debate about some aspects of Milton's theology, most significantly his notions about the status, nature and role of the Son within the Trinity and on the relationship between the theology of Milton's treatise and his epics.

See, especially, 93.10, and

In recent years, an interesting debate has centered upon the attribution of CD. See especially

Index

Achinstein, Sharon 90
Adamson, J. H. 204
Aers, David 138
Almoni, Peloni 11.24
Anselment, Raymond A. 120
Armitage, David 94, 94.11
Auksi, Peter 124
Ayers, Robert W. 173
Bagwell, Richard 70
Bangs, Carl 55
Barker, Arthur E. 41, 130
Barker, Francis 138, 145
Bauman, Michael 194, 209, 210, 211, 212
Baxendall, Lee 135
Bennett, Joan S. 95.12, 160
Berry, Lloyd E. 180
Blum, Abbe 143
Bossy, John 59
Bottigheimer, Karl S. 73
Bowers, Robin A. 191
Bradshaw, Brendan 165, 168
Brown, Cedric C. 94.3
Burton, K. M. 4
Cable, Lana 91, 93.8, 126
Came, J.-F. 150
Campbell, Gordon 7, 29, 34, 205, 206, 218
Carlin, Norah 168
Carlton, Charles 62
Charles I 15
Clark, Donald L. 151 [End Page 19]
Corns, Thomas N. 3, 38, 42, 86, 87, 89, 93.7, 94.2, 95.3, 96, 98, 106, 107, 109, 117, 142, 157, 218, 220
Coughlan, Patricia 167
Daems, Jim 164
Danielson, Dennis 96, 207
Darbishire, Helen 31
Davies, Hugh Sykes 105
Davies, Julian 65
Davies, Stevie 163
Davies, Tony 94.13
Dobranski, Stephen B. 95, 95.1, 95.8
Downie, J. A. 86
Durham, Charles W. 162
Dzelzainis, Martin 94.1, 94.10
Egan, James 100, 119, 171
Ekfelt, Fred Emil 103, 104
Emma, Ronald David 97, 101
Evans, John X. 149
Fallon, Robert T. 188
Fallon, Stephen M. 93.4, 95.6
Ferguson, Margaret W. 127, 143, 144
Fish, Stanley 93.3, 110, 113, 144
Fixler, Michael 118
Flannagan, Roy 10
Fletcher, Harris F. 24, 152
Fogle, French R. 182
Fortescue, G. K. 12
French, J. Milton 30
Gardiner, S. R. 67, 68, 69
Gilman, Ernest B. 154
Gleason, John B. 181
Goldberg, Jonathan 8
Grace, William J. 189
Greaves, Richard L. 26
Griffith, Matthew 11.33
Guibbory, Achsah 161, 185
Hadfield, Andrew 165, 168
Hale, John K. 95.9, 218
Halkett, John 131
Hall, Joseph 11.22, 11.23
Haller, William 45, 46
Hamilton, Gary D. 93.14
Hamilton, K. G. 101
Healy, Thomas 42, 167
Helgerson, Richard 158, 193
Henry, Nathaniel H. 175
Hiles, Jane 162
Hill, Christopher 36 , 39, 47, 48, 49, 50, 71, 72, 216
Himy, Armand 94, 94.7
Hodgson, Elizabeth 128
Hoffman, Richard L. 190
Holmes, David 218, 220
Holstun, James 63
Huckabay, Calvin 17, 20
Hughes, Merritt Y. 9
Hunter, William B. 28, 92.10, 204, 213, 214, 217, 219
Huntley, John F. 92.3
Hutton, Ronald 79
Illo, John 135, 136
Johnson, Samuel 32
Kahn, Victoria 94.5
Kelley, Maurice 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 215
Kendrick, Christopher 140
Kerrigan, William 95.7
Klemp, Paul J. 19, 20
Knachel, Philip A. 15
Knoppers, Laura Lungers 93.12
Knott, John R. 93.9
Kolbrener, William 146
Kollmeier, Harold 25
Kranidas, Thomas 110, 111, 114, 115, 116, 141
Kress, Gunther 138
Lamont, William 53, 85
Le Comte, Edward S. 92.4, 133, 177
Lejosne, Roger 94.6
L'Estrange, Sir Roger 11.34
Lewalski, Barbara Kiefer 95.4, 170, 172, 213, 221
Lieb, Michael 92, 92.2, 192
Loewenstein, David 93, 93.1, 93.10, 95.10, 155
McCabe, Richard 125
McGregor, J. F. 61
Madan, F. F. 16
Maley, Willy 165, 168
Manning, Brian 58
Masson, David 33
Merritt, J. F. 83
Miller, Leo 132, 187
Milner, Andrew 37
Miner, Earl 186
Morrill, J. S. 65
Moulin, Pierre du 11.31
Mueller, Janel 93.2, 95.2
Neumann, Joshua H. 102
New, John F. H. 54 [End Page 20]
Norbrook, David 84
Nyquist, Mary 127, 143, 144
Ohlmeyer, Jane H. 169
O'Keeffe, Timothy J. 159
Oldfield, Sybil 85
Ollard, Richard 179
Ong, Walter J. 92.9
Orgel, Stephen 8
Parker, William Riley 13, 14, 34
Patterson, Annabel 88, 93.5, 145
Patterson, Frank Allen 1
Patrick, J. Max 5
Patrides, C. A. 6, 18, 201, 202, 203, 204
Pennington, D. 76
Perlette, John M. 134
Phillips, John 153
Price, Alan F. 148
Pruitt McColgan, Kristin 162
Raylor, Timothy 43
Reay, B. 61
Richardson, R. C. 117
Rosenberg, Donald M. 121, 122
Rumrich, John P. 95, 95.1, 95.5
Russell, C. 56
S., G. 11.35, 14
Sadler, Florence 92.6
Samuel, Irene 184
Sanchez, Reuben Marquez 129, 176
Sauer, Elizabeth 95.11
Saumaise, Claude (Salmasius) 11.30
Sawday, Jonathan 42, 167
Schwartz, Regina 93.13
Sharpe , Kevin 81, 186
Shawcross, John T. 21, 22, 92, 92.5, 92.11, 213
Sherman, Sandra 147
Shullenberger, William 208
Skinner, Quentin 94, 183
Smallenburg, Harry 92.8, 139
Smectymnuus 11.25, 11.26
Smith, Nigel 64, 82, 93.6, 94.8
Speck, W. A. 86
Stanwood, P. G. 161
Stapleton, Laurence 200
Stavely, Keith W. 99
Sterne, Laurence 25
Stevens, D. H. 23
Stevens, Paul 166
Stewart, Stanley 174
Stone, Lawrence 77
Strong, Roy 156
Thomas, Keith 76
Treip, Mindele 108
Trevor-Roper, H. R. 51, 52, 182
Tudor-Craig, Pamela 179
Turner, James Grantham 80, 93, 93.1, 93.15
Tuttle, Elizabeth 94.4
Tweedie, Fiona 218, 220
Tyacke, Nicholas 56, 57
Underdown, David E. 74, 75
Via, John A. 123
Von Maltzahn, Nicholas 94.12, 178
Wallace, Dewey D. 60
Watson, George 105
Webber, Joan 112
Wilding, Michael 142
Williams, Arnold 175
Wilson, A. N. 35
Wittreich, Joseph Anthony 92.1, 95.13, 137
Wolfe, Don M. 2, 40
Woodhouse, A. S. P. 44
Woods, Susanne 93.11
Woolrych, Austin 78, 92.7, 179
Worden, Blair 94.9
Zaller, Robert 26
Zwicker, Stephen N. 186

 

http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/milton_quarterly/v033/33.1corns.html